Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Linda S. Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 1, 1994No. 92-7186Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWald, Circuit Judge

I concur in my colleagues’ conclusion that the district court properly submitted the issue of causation of Lewis’ knee injuries to the jury, but do not agree that the district court erred by similarly allowing the jury to decide the question of causation with respect to the wrist injury. The standard of review for the district court’s denial of a judgment as a matter of law is narrow, and the challenging party bears an “extremely heavy” burden. Ferebee v. Chevron Chem. Co., 736 F.2d 1529, 1534 (D.C.Cir.) (quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1062, 105 S.Ct. 545, 83…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Carl McNeal v. Hi-Lo Powered Scaffolding, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Baltimore v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Sekou Ealy v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. Jones v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API