Anthony v. Norton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Coffey district court; W. A. Randolph, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*342The opinion of the court was delivered by
Doster, C. J. :
This was an action brought by Mrs. E. M. Norton, a widow, against O. L. Anthony, for damages for the seduction of her daughter, Turie Norton. Besides a denial of the imputed act, the defense was that the daughter was of full age, and did not, as to-'-her mother, stand in the relation of a servant .to a mistress, and that no loss of service to the mother, as mistress, had resulted from the alleged wrong. The daughter was about twenty-five years old at the time of the seduction- charged, and was clerking in a store. At and before that time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Riddle v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Lipe v. . EisenlerdNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Badgley v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1865
- Moran v. DawesNew York Supreme Court · 1825
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Alderman v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Snider v. Newell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Wingerd v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.