Legal Opinion

Anthony v. Norton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1899No. 1138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Coffey district court; W. A. Randolph, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*342The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J. :

This was an action brought by Mrs. E. M. Norton, a widow, against O. L. Anthony, for damages for the seduction of her daughter, Turie Norton. Besides a denial of the imputed act, the defense was that the daughter was of full age, and did not, as to-'-her mother, stand in the relation of a servant .to a mistress, and that no loss of service to the mother, as mistress, had resulted from the alleged wrong. The daughter was about twenty-five years old at the time of the seduction- charged, and was clerking in a store. At and before that time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Riddle v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lipe v. . EisenlerdNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Badgley v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Moran v. DawesNew York Supreme Court · 1825

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Alderman v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Snider v. Newell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Wingerd v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API