Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Pursuant to the court’s July 16, 1999 order, the parties submitted supplemental briefs on the award of costs. The issue for decision is whether the court, in its discretion, can and should award defendant costs as the prevailing party, when, after the court issued a judgment in defendant’s favor on the merits post-trial and awarded defendant its costs, the court on plaintiffs motion for reconsideration determined that plaintiff was entitled to recover on one minor claim.
FACTS
The facts of this case, having been discussed amply in the court’s three prior opinions, will not be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Neal & Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Gary D. Austin, Ann Crispin, Arlana Hines, Anola Nightengale v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Die Casters International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006