Legal Opinion

Fudim v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. Docket No. 10309-91UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EFREM V. FUDIM AND MARGARITA L. FUDIM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Fudim v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10309-91

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-235; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 240; 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 3011;

May 26, 1994, Filed

Efrem V. Fudim, pro se.

For respondent: Mark J. Miller.

PATE

PATE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

PATE, Special Trial Judge: This case was assigned pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b)(3) and Rules 180, 181, and 182. 1

Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes of $ 661, $ 3,449, and $ 3,276 for 1986, 1987,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Estate of Emerson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. McFerrinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. J. J. Powell, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API