Legal Opinion
Noble v. Harvey Weinstein, Robert Weinstein, the Weinstein Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided August 13, 2018No. 17 Civ. 9260 (RWS)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sweet, D.J.
Defendants Harvey Weinstein ("Harvey") and Robert Weinstein ("Robert") have moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Amended Complaint of plaintiff Kadian Noble ("Noble" or "Plaintiff") alleging violations of the Victims of Trafficking Victims Protection Act ("TVPA"), 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (" Section 1591"), under which a civil private right of action exists ( 18 U.S.C. § 1595 (" Section 1595") ), to Harvey's alleged 2014 sexual assault of Plaintiff in Cannes, France.1
The alleged predatory sexual conduct of Harvey Weinstein has been the subject of extensive…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- G.G. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Geiss v. Weinstein Company Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- United States v. RaniereCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- United States v. RaniereDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- United States v. Omar TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.