Stuart v. Scottsdale, City of

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mark E Stuart, et al., No. CV-20-00755-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Scottsdale, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 16 70), to which Defendants have responded (Doc. 75) and Plaintiffs have replied (Doc. 77), 17 and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 64), to which Plaintiffs have 18 responded (Doc. 86) and Defendants have replied (Doc. 89). The motions have been fully 19 briefed and the Court concludes that oral…