Legal Opinion
Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 15, 2017No. 15-1190 Consolidated with 15-1282Published
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
The court considered this petition on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The panel has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review of the-decision of the National Labor Relations Board is DENIED and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is GRANTED.
Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc., petitions this court for review of the National Labor Relations Board’s decision that it violated…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company, Intervenor. George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Brusco Tug & Barge Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Telemundo De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Alois Box Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Pearson Education, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.