Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Mumuni

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af firmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice David Friedman at the Appellate Division (22 AD3d 186).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read. Judge R.S. Smith dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Justice John W Sweeny at the Appellate Division (22 AD3d 186, 191-193).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernard v. MumuniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Murphy v. CarnesiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Britt v. Pharmacologic PET Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Eagle Insurance v. LuciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SajewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API