Ahrens v. Town of Fulton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶ 1. Richard Ahrens and approximately 136 to 138 other mobile home owners (owners)1 appeal from a court of appeals' decision that held that, with respect to all but one of the twenty representative owners chosen to represent the entire class, their mobile homes were appropriately taxed as real property, as opposed to personal property as the owners contend. The statutes require that a mobile home must be "set upon a foundation" before it can be *148taxed as real property. We conclude that all of the representative owners' mobile homes were "set upon a foundation" within the meaning of the statute.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Glinski v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of LeedsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Meyer v. School District of ColbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Wisconsin Conference Board of Trustees of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. CulverWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Columbia Propane, L.P. v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Kohn v. Darlington Community SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Mullen v. WalczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Columbus Park Housing Corp. v. City of KenoshaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.