Legal Opinion

Heuay v. HALIFAX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1961No. 164PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinboeNe, C.J.

The determinative question to be decided in case on appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in allowing defendant’s motion for nonsuit.

Taking the evidence offered upon the trial in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and giving to her the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, as is done when considering a motion for judgment of nonsuit, it is manifest that the plaintiff has failed to make out a case for the jury. Mills v. Moore, 219 N.C. 25, 12 S.E. 2d 661.

In order to establish actionable negligence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Jackson v. NEILL McKAY GIN COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Jones v. CB Atkins CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Williamson v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Jarrett v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API