Legal Opinion
Cohn v. Rosenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1943No. Civ. 12452PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the above entitled action for failure to use reasonable diligence in the prosecution thereof.
The action was pending in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco, and was for the recovery of moneys alleged to be due as rental for the use and occupation of real property and for the sale and delivery of machinery. The complaint was filed on February 29, 1932, and the answer on July 11, 1932. On March 9, 1933, plaintiff moved to set the cause for trial, and on July 31,1933, after several continuances ordered by the court, it…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Harris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Andre v. General Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hassett v. ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL ASS'NNevada Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.