Legal Opinion

Timm v. Arvidson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in claim and delivery. The plaintiff seeks to recover certain grain raised upon plaintiff's land. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

In June, 1920, the plaintiff, Lydia Timm, entered into a written contract with the defendant John Arvidson and Robert Mellum, by the terms of which Arvidson and Mellum agreed to farm certain lands belonging to the plaintiff in the county of McLean, during the years 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924 and 1925 commencing on the first of November, 1920, and ending November 1, 1925. Mellum dropped out of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Banbury v. SherinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wadsworth v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Herrmann v. Minnekota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Estrid BensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API