Legal Opinion

Mayor of Newark v. Hatt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 48 Vroom 48.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

Bergen, J.

The commissioners of assessment for local

improvements in the city of Newark made an award for damages to certain landowners arising from the vacation of several public highways; among them were George T. Hatt, Addison Brown, Charles F. Kilburn and Walter D. Osborne. The mayor and common council of the city of Newark being dissatisfied with the award, removed the proceedings to the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari, in which court the award to the aforesaid landowners was set aside, which judgment was brought here on error by Kilburn and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanwood v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. City of Chicago v.BurckyIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. City of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. BucsiOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mandell v. Board of Com'rs of Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Atlanta v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API