Legal Opinion

Knipp, Temp. Admr. v. Kutchinsky

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1942No. 7951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

The sole question presented here is whether Article 3378, Revised Civil Statutes 1925, authorizes the probate court to appoint a temporary administrator of an estate, pending an appeal to the district court from the order of the probate court relating to the probate of a will, and which appeal has been duly perfected.

This suit was filed in the District Court of Harris County by E. A. Knipp, as temporary administrator of the estate of Mrs. Sarah May Kutchinsky, in the nature of a bill of discovery, under Rule 737 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and for injunction against Joseph…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Foreign Mission Board of Southern Baptist ConventionTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Norwood v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Ware v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Huth v. HuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Quiroz v. CantuCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corpus Christi Bank and Trust v. Alice National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Alice National Bank v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. King v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Podgoursky v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Baptist Foundation of Texas v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API