Legal Opinion
Smith v. Howard Johnson Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1993No. 92-1335PublishedCited by 180 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. XVI, has certified the following questions to us:
“1. Does Ohio recognize a claim for intentional or negligent spoliation of evidence and/or tortious interference with prospective civil litigation?
“2. If so,
“a. What are the elements of such a claim; and
“b. Does such a claim exist between the parties to the primary action (i.e., the action in which the spoliated evidence would have been used), or does it only exist against third-party spoliators?
“3. If the answer to 2(b) is that such a claim…
2Cited by180 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.