Legal Opinion

Precision Theatrical Effects, Inc. v. United Banks, N.A.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2006No. 05-565PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Precision Theatrical Effects, Inc. (“PTE”), and Russell R. Nickel, in his individual capacity, filed a complaint in the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court alleging three counts against United Banks, N.A. (“United”). United moved for summary judgment on all issues, while PTE and Nickel moved for partial summary judgment. The court granted summary judgment to United on all three issues and denied plaintiffs’ motion.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in concluding, as a matter of law, that since PTE and Nickel defaulted on the bank loans, United did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kunst v. PassMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gliko v. PermannMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kleinhesselink v. Chevron, U.S.A.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lachenmaier v. First Bank Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Knucklehead Land Co. v. Accutitle, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. McCoy v. First Citizens BankMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. First Security Bank v. Abel AbelMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. First Security Bank v. Abel AbelMontana Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API