Legal Opinion

Kunst v. Pass

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1998No. 97-468PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Plaintiffs Denise Kunst (Kunst) and Charla Erpenbach (Erpenbach) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the order of the District Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County, denying their post-trial motion for attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶2 The issues raised on appeal are as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in denying Plaintiffs’ bill of costs as untimely?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in denying Plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s fees?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Limberhand v. Big Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nehring v. LaCounteMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mysse v. MartensMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Richardson v. Corvallis Public School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Herman v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Zempel v. LibertyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Braach v. GraybealMontana Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API