Legal Opinion
Donnkenny, Inc. v. Nadler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1982No. 81 Civ. 6075(MP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donnkenny has moved pursuant to Rule 12(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. for a) an order striking the Fifth Defense interposed by the defendant Thornhill which alleges that this action is barred as against defendant Thornhill by virtue of the compulsory counterclaim requirement in Rule 13(a); and b) staying defendant Thornhill’s action against Donnkenny now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (Civ. No. 81-0354) insofar as that action seeks to have determined whether defendant Thornhill’s employment contract with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- E. J. Korvette Co. v. Parker Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Leonard F. Fellman Co. v. Smith-Corona Marchant Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Jepco Corp. v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Ultronic Systems Corp. v. Ultronix, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- W. A. Krueger Co. v. Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley HillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Directory International, Inc. v. Bates Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
- Donnkenny, Inc. v. NadlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989