Legal Opinion

Lifschultz Fast Freight v. JBS Warehousing, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 20, 1992No. 92 C 6484PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant JBS Warehousing, Inc.’s (“JBS”) motion to stay proceedings. The motion is granted for the following reasons.

FACTS

Plaintiff Lifschultz Fast Freight (“Lifschultz”) is a carrier seeking to collect an unpaid freight bill for freight transported pursuant to the authority issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”) and subject to tariff rates and rules filed with the ICC. According to the complaint, Lifschultz transported freight tendered by JBS and issued invoices in the total amount of $6,110.82, which amount remains unpaid. JBS,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Atlantis Express, Inc. v. Standard Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc. v. YaquintoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Transtop, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gross Common Carrier, Inc. v. A.B. Dick Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. Allen v. Spiegel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Jiffy Products of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. Stationers Distributing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Lewis v. Helios Container Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API