Legal Opinion

State v. Pomper

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1993No. 92-1142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court dismissed charges against appellee on double jeopardy grounds. Because the dismissed charges do not require the proof of an offense for which appellee has already been prosecuted, we reverse and remand to reinstate the charges.

Appellee was originally charged with five counts relating to the passing of two bad checks on April 2, 1990, and April 3, 1990. Count I alleged grand theft on April 2, 1990. Count II alleged a violation of Section 832.05(4) by the passing of a check # 253 in the amount of $625. Count III alleged a violation of Section 832.-05(3)(a) by depositing “a bank…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API