Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1934Published

1Dissent

Crapser, J. (dissenting).

The action is brought to obtain an injunction permanently restraining the defendant (a) from further prosecuting, or procuring or suffering to be further prosecuted, the action which defendant had brought for the dissolution of the so-called The Mechanicville and Fort Edward Railroad Company, which dissolution action was considered by this court in the equity suit of Boston & Maine R. R. v. Delaware & Hudson (238 App. Div. 191), decided in May, 1933; and (b) from commencing or prosecuting, or procuring or suffering to be prosecuted, any action at law, suit in equity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fish v. . VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Donahue v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Mechanicville & Fort Edward Railroad v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API