Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Asia Limited v. Citibank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 18, 1988No. 652, Docket 87-7685PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York after a bench trial before Whitman Knapp, Judge, awarding plaintiff Wells Fargo Asia Limited (“WFAL”) $1,066,000 as the balance due on certain time deposits carried by Citibank’s branch in Manila, Philippines (“Citibank/Manila”). See 660 F.Supp. 946 (1987) (“1987 Opinion”). Citibank contends that judgment should have been entered in its favor because the obligation to repay the deposits was suspended by a decree of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Wards Company, Inc. v. Stamford Ridgeway Associates and Trim Fashions, Inc., Stamford Ridgeway AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Zimmermann v. Sutherland, Alien Property CustodianSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wells Fargo Asia Limited v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Citibank, N. A. v. Wells Fargo Asia Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Citibank, N. A. v. Wells Fargo Asia Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990