Wright v. McClintock
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of DuPage County; the Hon. M. O. Southwobth, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell
Where an agent employed to sell property induces a party to go to his principal and a sale is effected to such party through his efforts or information derived from him, the agent is entitled to a commission, although he does not personally introduce the purchaser to his principal. Where an agent is employed to sell real estate for the owner or undertakes the employment and is instrumental in bringing the owner and the buyer together, and the owner then concludes the sale at a less price than the agent was authorised to sell, the agent is entitled to compensation for his services. Wilson v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Hafner v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Henry v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Rigdon v. MoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Lehigh Valley Transportation Co. v. Post Sugar Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Thorne v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. GuildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
- Francisco v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.