Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 31, 1992No. Docket No. 28722-88UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS V. TINSLEY, JR. AND KATHERINE S. TINSLEY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Tinsley v. Commissioner

Docket No. 28722-88

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-195; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 204; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2629;

March 31, 1992, Filed

An appropriate order will be issued.

Thomas W. Ostrander, for petitioners.

Michael D. Baker, Kenneth J. Rubin, and Ruth M. Spadaro, for respondent.

COLVIN

COLVIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLVIN, Judge: This matter is before the Court on Petitioners' Motion for Award of Reasonable Litigation Costs under section 7430 and Rule 231.

The case was…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. Sher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wade v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API