Legal Opinion
Bagley v. Monticello Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 15, 1999PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
We granted the plaintiff’s application for direct appellate review to decide whether exclusionary provisions contained in an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Monticello Insurance Company (Monticello), precluded coverage for a judgment the plaintiff obtained against Monticello’s insured, Trader Alan’s Fifth Wheel, Inc. (Trader Alan’s). The plaintiff recovered the judgment in the underlying action after she had been assaulted and raped while staying at Trader Alan’s motel. The plaintiff filed this action in the Superior Court against Monticello seeking to reach and apply its policy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Barnstable County Mutual Fire Insurance v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Hermitage InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Doe v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Doe v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Brazas Sporting Arms, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- B & T Masonry Construction Co. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Guideone Elite Insurance v. Old Cutler Presbyterian Church, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- A.W. Chesterton Co. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.