Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Board of Water Commissioners

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The first reason of appeal assigns error in sustaining the plaintiff's demurrer to paragraphs six to eleven of the answer. These paragraphs in themselves attempt to allege a complete and independent defense to the complaint and were evidently treated as such by the trial court, and properly so. As a preliminary question defendant invokes the rule that a demurrer interposed at any stage of the case searches the record and judgment is awarded against the party who first advances a defective pleading, and specifically urges that the complaint is defective in that it supplies no allegation “that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. President, Directors & Co. of the Mechanics Bank v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  2. Woodruff v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Sutherland v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  4. Neuschtat v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spirt v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Young v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Filippone v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Hartwell v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Hartford v. Connecticut Natural Gas CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API