Legal Opinion

Balla v. Idaho

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2012No. 10-35413PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:

We address an attorneys’ fees award in a class action under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

Facts

This is a class action, more than a quarter century old, by Idaho state prisoners at the Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI). The district court initially “was not successful in obtaining attorney representation” 1 for the prisoners, so they litigated pro se. They went to trial and won their case. The court found, in 1984, that because of deliberate indifference, without any connection to a legitimate penological purpose, the inmates were subjected…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Prison Legal News v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Gates v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Richard S. v. Department of Developmental Services of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. K.C. Ex Rel. Erica C. v. TorlaksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Binta B. Ex Rel. S.A. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Larry J. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Louise King v. Geico Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API