Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Winstead

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1943No. 7108PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to require' and direct Hon. Charles E. Winstead, one of the judges of the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the state of Idaho in and for Ada county, to take jurisdiction of the divorce suit of Hawkins v. Hawkins, commenced in said district court by the applicant herein against his wife, Laura Hawkins, August 24, 1942. An alternative writ issued to which the defendant answered denying jurisdiction on the ground applicant was not a resident of the State of Idaho at the time he filed his complaint.

The facts appear to be substantially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Silvey v. . LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Ex parte WhiteDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1915
  3. Wood v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Johnston v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Powell v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mohr v. MohrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Clark v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Evans v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Greene v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API