Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1925No. 3114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The contention presented by the first assignment is that the trial court erred when he refused appellants’ request that he submit to the jury special issues as follows: “(1) What was the consideration for the lease of the Texas property? (2) Has that consideration been paid?”

We think the contention should be overruled. According to recitals in the instrument evidencing the lease of the 100 acres in Harrison county, the consideration therefor to appellants was $1 paid to them and the undertaking of the lessee (1) on or before February 1, 1924,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Moore v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burt v. DeorsamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Jackson v. Pure Oil Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API