Bryson v. Fuller
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The contention presented by the first assignment is that the trial court erred when he refused appellants’ request that he submit to the jury special issues as follows: “(1) What was the consideration for the lease of the Texas property? (2) Has that consideration been paid?”
We think the contention should be overruled. According to recitals in the instrument evidencing the lease of the 100 acres in Harrison county, the consideration therefor to appellants was $1 paid to them and the undertaking of the lessee (1) on or before February 1, 1924,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Moore v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Burt v. DeorsamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Jackson v. Pure Oil Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953