Legal Opinion

Regulic v. Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2022No. 21AP-268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Regulic v. Columbus,

2022-Ohio-1034.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Slobodan Regulic et al., : Plaintiffs-Relators/ : Appellants, No. 21AP-268 : (C.P.C. No. 20CV-3396) v. : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) City of Columbus et al., : Defendants-Respondents/ Appellees. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 29, 2022 On brief: O'Reilly Law Offices, and Michael J. O'Reilly, for appellants. Argued: Michael J. O'Reilly. On brief: Zach Klein, City Attorney, Alana V. Tanoury, and Sheena D. Rosenberg, for appellees. Argued: Alana V. Tanoury. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Fletcher v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cool v. FrenchkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Gore v. MohamodOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Friedman v. Bexley Pub. LibraryOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State ex rel. McCarley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Young v. Franklin Cty. TreasurerOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API