Legal Opinion

Gold Mine Investments, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 19, 2013No. 108,390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.;

In this appeal we are asked to apply a requirement in a “Protective Safeguards” endorsement to a fire insurance policy that “All Electric is on Functioning and Operational Circuit Breakers.”

Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company (Mount Vernon) issued the policy that contained this endorsement to Gold Mine Investments, Inc., doing business as Gold Realty (Gold) for fire coverage on a commercial building Gold owned in Atchison. The building was destroyed by fire, and Mount Vernon denied coverage, claiming that Gold breached the policy by having both a fuse box and circuit breakers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HorinekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Carrothers Construction Co. v. City of South HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Kansas Farm Bureau Insurance v. CoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Edwards v. Anderson Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of PeaseCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. Simpson v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  3. Simpson v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API