Sierra Trading Post, Inc. v. Hinson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The question for review is whether a worker, whom the employer allowed to start work with the understanding that she must pass a pre-employment drug screening test, is entitled to unemployment benefits when the employment is terminated due to a positive drug test. We hold that she is not. The [Unemployment Insurance Commission (Commission) ruled that Theresa Hinson’s (Hinson) drug use was not “misconduct connected with her work” and she was eligible for benefits. Since Hinson had not satisfied the condition subsequent upon which the continuation of employment depended, we hold…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Employment Security Commission v. Western Gas Processors, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Herrera v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hansen v. Little Bear Inn Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- ACT I, LLC v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Principal Life Insurance Co. v. Summit Well Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Evans v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.