Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 21, 1975No. 1208-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

This appeal from a judgment modifying an award of child support raises a first impression issue in this state. Does the new age of majority act, which took effect subsequent to a divorce but prior to modification of support, apply to the modification order? We hold that for this purpose a modification proceeding is a continuation of the original divorce action which created a vested right to support unless modified by the court. The new age of majority act does not apply.

The parties to this action were divorced on April 3, 1964. The decree provided that George Cunningham was to pay $50 per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Mauerman v. SUP'R CT. FOR THURSTON CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Springstun v. SpringstunWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. In Re Marriage of MelvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Calcagno v. CalcagnoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. In Re the Marriage of HarlessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Lang v. LangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Lang v. LangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API