Legal Opinion

Seiden v. . Reimer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1920, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 25, 1920, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The first action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant. The second action was by the father of the plaintiff in the first action to recover for loss of services of his son arising from his injuries. The infant plaintiff was steering a bobsled as he and two other boys…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., and McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. Barone v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Pacilio v. ScarpatiCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Combes v. SnowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API