Legal Opinion

State v. Workers' Socialist Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1921No. 22,440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Defendants were indicted by the grand jnry of St. Louis county charged with the crime of teaching and advocating syndicalism, tried in the district court for that county 'before Dancer, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in. the indictment. From an order denying their motion for a new trial, Workers’ Socialist Publishing Company, A. A. Twonen and Topias Kekkonen appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Defendants were indicted and convicted under chapter 215, p. 311, Laws 1917, known as the criminal syndicalism act. Defendants appeal.

The language of the statute is as follows: “Any person who by word of mouth or writing, advocates or teaches the duty, necessity or propriety of crime, sabotage, violence or other unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political ends, or prints, publishes, edits, issues or knowingly circulates, sells, distributes or publicly displays any book, paper, document or written matter in any form, containing or advocating, advising or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Commonwealth v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. State v. MoilenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. People v. FullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Taylor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. Chapman Dodge Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. State v. SentnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API