Legal Opinion

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court erred by including the "or remains” language in its charge to the jury on burglary in the second degree under the facts of this case (see, People v Gaines, 74 NY2d 358; People v Santiago, 158 AD2d 996, lv denied 75 NY2d 970; People v Ferguson, 158 AD2d 712), defendant, by failing to object to the charge as given, has failed to preserve this issue for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to reverse defendant’s conviction in the interest of justice. The evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API