Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Independent School District No. 709
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 23, 2000No. 99-393 JRT/RLEPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jesse Montgomery brings this action against Independent School District Number 709 (the “School District”) based on its failure to prevent harassment by other students that he experienced during approximately eleven years of education in defendant’s schools. Plaintiff asserts that the other students harassed him both because of his gender and his perceived sexual orientation. He brings claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. §§ 363.01-363.20, the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stiles ex rel. D.S. v. Grainger CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Donovan v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Theno v. Tonganoxie Unified School District No. 464District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Ross v. University of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.