Legal Opinion

McGregor v. Echols

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating the facts). The court erred in instructing a verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiff purchased the land for $40,000 and sold it to the defendant for $50,000. The defendant paid $500 at the time the written contract fox' the sale of the land was executed. There was about $1,600 or $1,700 of personal property that was to go with the land. By deducting the $500 paid when the contract was'executed and the value of the personal property in the sum of $1,700 from $10,000, the estimated profits of Echols, the court arrived at the sum of $7,800, for which the jury was directed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Hodges v. KowingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  3. Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kempner v. CohnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Porter v. TravisIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. McMaster v. McIlroy BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Hearrell v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Williams v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Miller v. Estate of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API