Willis v. City of Perry
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. J. H. Hendebson, Judge. Action for damages caused by diverting water from a flowing well. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
The undisputed facts in this case are that, in 1888, plaintiff sunk a well on her lot in the city of Perry, Iowa, and secured a flow of water therefrom, which rose to a height of several feet above the surface of the ground. She erected a bath house, and piped the water from the well into said house and the bath tubs therein, and built up a large aud profitable business. In 1890 one Blank sunk a well on his ground, near to plaintiff’s well; and, very soon after, one Burlington sunk a well on his land near plaintiff’s well. Both the Blank and Burlington wells were situated on ground…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Jones v. AdamsNevada Supreme Court · 1885
- Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Huber v. MerkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. HulbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Hathorn v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Gagnon v. French Lick Springs Hotel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.