Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Bekaert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1956No. 15298PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

An injured party obtained a judgment in negligence against the driver of an automobile, on which execution was returned unsatisfied. She then sought, by garnishment proceedings under Nebraska law, to collect the amount of the judgment from the liability insurer of the owner of the car, on the basis that the automobile was being used at the time of the accident with the named-insured’s permission, and that the driver therefore was covered, under the omnibus clause of the policy, as an additional insured. 1

On a jury-waived trial of the issue thus presented, the court made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Witthauer v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  4. Wigington v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. AbchalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KerseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API