Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1952No. 14350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to hold erroneous a declaration of Nebraska law made by the trial court, as well as its applicability to the evidentiary situation presented.

The action is one against an insurer, on a policy of automobile liability insurance, under its omnibus coverage clause, by the holder of a judgment against a third party for personal injuries — the third party, according to the findings of the court, having been using the automobile of the named insured at the time of the accident, with the consent of a permittee (a foster son) of the named insured, but without the consent in fact, either…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. KalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. Wigington v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Helmkamp v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. AbchalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Glenn F. Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. Dodson v. SiscoDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API