Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
We are asked to hold erroneous a declaration of Nebraska law made by the trial court, as well as its applicability to the evidentiary situation presented.
The action is one against an insurer, on a policy of automobile liability insurance, under its omnibus coverage clause, by the holder of a judgment against a third party for personal injuries — the third party, according to the findings of the court, having been using the automobile of the named insured at the time of the accident, with the consent of a permittee (a foster son) of the named insured, but without the consent in fact, either…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. KalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Wigington v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by11 opinions
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Helmkamp v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hanover Insurance Company v. AbchalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Glenn F. Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Dodson v. SiscoDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.