Legal Opinion
McCoy v. Hardeman (In Re Tahah)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2005No. BAP No. WO-04-067, Bankruptcy No. 03-24022-NLJPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
Appellant Kenneth C. McCoy (“McCoy”) appeals an Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma partially denying his request for attorney’s fees in a dismissed Chapter 13 case. We REVERSE the bankruptcy court’s Order, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
*779I. Background
On December 24, 2003, the Debtors filed a petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code (“2003 case”). McCoy was their attorney. The 2003 case was dismissed on April 21, 2004, prior to the confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan. On the following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Caldo Mares and Sally Mares, His Wife v. Credit Bureau of Raton, and Janet Yarbrough, Individually, and in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re RogersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
- In Re WesseldineUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- In re LindseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Colpitts v. Eck (In Re Rogers)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Demery v. JohnsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.