Legal Opinion

Fanders v. RIVERSIDE RESORT & CASINO, INC.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2010No. 51225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

This case arises from an intentional tort and negligence action filed by appellant Juana Fanders after she allegedly was injured by security guards on the premises of her former employer, respondent Riverside Resort and Casino, Inc. Respondents Angela M. Grissom, Louis G. Marino, David E. Barnes, Danny Lundsford, John C. England, and Ona Rogers were the security guards involved in the incident. The district court granted summary judgment to respondents on all counts based on its conclusion that all of Fanders’ claims were precluded by the exclusivity provision…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. MilkoNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Anderson v. Hotel CataractSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CANNON COCHRAN MGMT. SERVS., INC. VS. FIGUEROANevada Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Lee v. Diet Center LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. Recontrust Co. v. ZhangNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Warren v. Hilton Grand VacationsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API