Aaron v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Petitioners, who sought a writ of prohibition to prohibit their prosecution for violation of a municipal ordinance which outlawed soliciting without a license, have appealed from the judgment (order signed and filed August 2, 1976) denying their petition. 1 (See fn. 2.) Their standing to challenge the constitutionality of the local ordinance is not challenged. 2 Since the attack on the ordinance followed the overruling of the petitioners’ demurrers to complaints filed against them, there is no factual setting concerning the application of the ordinance. Review is…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gates v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Hillman v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gates v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.