Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Cook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderburgh Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

Cook sued Wheeler, Farrar and Jesse Armstrong as makers,' and Cyrus Armstrong as indorser of a promissory note. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The fir§t avers, that on the first day of February, 1866, Wheeler, Farrar, and Jesse Armstrong made, and Cyrus Armstrong indorsed, a promissory note, whereby the defendants promised to pay the plaintiff $2,999.32, at the Evansville National Bank, which remains unpaid, except $500; that on the 4th day of June, 1866, said defendants, Wheeler, Farrar and Armstrong, got wrongful possession of the note, upon the false pretense that they would give…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harbison v. Bank of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Brown v. TaberNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Denniston v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  4. Kasson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnston v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Jeffries v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Meeker v. ShanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bucklen v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Wilson v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API