Nations v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and assessed his punishment at confinement for 30 years. The conviction was affirmed. Nations v. State, 894 S.W.2d 480 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1995).
On direct appeal, appellant maintained the trial court erred by excluding the testimony of an expert witness. Appellant’s proffered expert testimony concerned the reliability of eyewitness identification. The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision to exclude the testimony and stated:
Appellant urges that in the instant cause,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Nations v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
4Cited by8 opinions
- Nations v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Bruno Aviles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Dino Baiza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Henry Mann v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Henry Mann v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.