Legal Opinion

Eschborn v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided February 21, 2017No. 2016-00171Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Eschborn v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.,

2017-Ohio-824.] ANNE ESCHBORN Case No. 2016-00171 Plaintiff Judge Dale A. Crawford v. ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Defendant {¶1} Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed, pursuant to Civ.R. 56, by Defendant, Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). Reply briefs have been submitted and reviewed. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that she was wrongfully terminated by ODOT, based on her gender, in violation of R.C. 4112.99. {¶2} On January 12, 2015, Plaintiff was hired as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API