Legal Opinion

Constantino Carrera v. Robert Ayers, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2011No. 08-99007PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We must today decide whether defense counsel’s failure in 1983 to object to a California prosecutor’s allegedly group bias-based peremptory challenges constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, which ineffectiveness now requires a grant of federal habeas relief under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

During the murder trial of Constantino Carrera, defense counsel failed to object to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to strike six Hispanic1 venirepersons. Carrera appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Visciotti v. MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. May v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  3. Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Mitcham v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Daniel L. Fortune v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API