Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Peaspanen v. Ohio State Teachers Retirement Board

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2001No. 00AP-1126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lazarus, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Judi Peaspanen, appeals from the August 18, 2000 decision and September 6, 2000 entry granting the motion of defendant-appellee, Ohio State Teachers Retirement Board (“STRB”), for summary judgment, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissing appellant’s complaint. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant, a librarian for Ashtabula High School, filed her application for disability retirement on October 29, 1991, alleging chemical sensitivity due to exposure to a urethane floor coating known as “Gold…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fair v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Schwaben v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Peaspanen v. Boards of Education of Ashtabula Area City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ackerman v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of Ohio, 06ap-1133 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API