Legal Opinion

Oregon Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, C. J.

The plaintiff, as subrogee, brought this tort action against the defendants to recover for a loss paid under a fire insurance policy issued to its insured. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff’s assured, Ronald D. Fowler and wife, operated a service station in the city of Bend, Oregon, and upon the premises of the assured was located a restaurant leased to a third party. A fire occurred on these premises and as a result of the fire plaintiff *558paid the appraised loss to its assured and seeks recovery from the defendants in this action.

At about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aune v. Oregon Trunk RailwayOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Senkirik v. ROYCEOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lovett v. GillOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Herring v. Springbrook Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Leavitt v. StampOregon Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Babler Bros. v. Pacific Inter-Mountain Express Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Woosley v. DunningOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. George I. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Wilson v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Fireman's Fund American Insurance v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API